If our president can take time to think about the men’s NCAA basketball tournament, so can I…
Well, honestly, I only sort of think about it. Beyond rooting for Harvard, which didn’t work out so well, I can’t claim to watch much, or be anywhere close to an expert on, college hoops. But I have been thinking about several NCAA sports stories lately. Here’s my round-up of the college sports issues that are on my mind.
1) Harvard basketball- We were oh-so-close to the dance. It was heartbreaking to watch The Crimson lose in the final 3 seconds on Saturday– and to my other alma mater, Princeton! I’ve always preferred crimson to orange (orange is just not in my color family), plus my paycheck comes from Cambridge. But both teams shared the Ivy League title this year, capping off an historic season for Harvard. The magic didn’t continue; but, who knows, maybe someday we’ll see two Ivy teams together in the tournament for the first time? Unfortunately, in the end, Harvard didn’t help its case that it should have gotten a bid, performing poorly in the NIT tournament last night (the first time they’d ever been invited). So, I must say, “Go Tigers!, on Thursday. Obama didn’t pick you (despite the First Lady’s ['85] urging, I’m sure), and you’re considered serious underdogs, but draw strength remembering your upset in 1996– wonderfully chronicled in Time this week. But, with all the key Crimson players returning next year, along with what is supposed to be a fantastic recruiting class, I hope we’ll find ourselves rooting instead for the Crimson in March 2012, ending the 68-year tournament-appearance drought.
2) NCAA female vs. male basketballers’ graduation rates-Well, the women win the battle, at least when it comes to performance in the classroom. A recent study out of University of Central Florida found that the schools representing the women’s teams in this year’s NCAA tournament graduate more team members than the men do. There are a lot of factors here– race, level of competitiveness, women’s documented superior classroom performance in other realms– but as the men get all the attention, it’s worth noting that more of the female scholar-athletes are living up to both parts of their hyphenated designation.
3) Stanford’s “easy class list”- Then again, as this USA Today article suggests, both male and female scholar-athletes sometimes get some academic breaks in college. Apparently Stanford, until very recently, maintained a list of “easy” classes that it gave to athletes. The university explains that the courses were scheduled at convenient times for athletes, in between practices. But, with names like “Social Dances of North America,” I’m guessing more was going on than scheduling. Alas, is it really surprising that courses from my discipline of sociology made the cut? If you’re interested in reading more about different academic standards and performances for collegiate athletes, I recommend reading Shulman and Bowen’s extremely detailed (though now slightly dated) and informative The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values. Can any of my Cardinal readers confirm the existence of this “easy” class list (one ESPN commentator, and a former softball player at Stanford had this to say)? I’m not sure there’s anything terribly wrong with it, especially if it would be offered to any student (even a non-athlete) who asked for it. What do others think?
On a final note, to sooth myself after the Harvard-Princeton game in New Haven on Saturday, I decided it was time to finally watch a documentary I’d been meaning to screen– Harvard Beats Yale 29-29. I’d heard and read lots of great things about it, so I went in expecting a lot and I was definitely disappointed. The story is naturally full of drama (even if there is no suspense, given that you know the outcome based on the infamous title), but I didn’t think it was produced well. I also would have loved to have seen all the former players get together for a reunion. Certainly the most entertaining, and despicable, character is Mike Bouscaren (you can read a bit about him in this Newsweek review), a Yalie who deliberately tried to physically injure players, taking one out of the game– though his memory is a bit faulty (turns out that injured player [Hornblower] is the father of a classmate who lived in my freshman year entryway). I haven’t yet read the book version, but suspect that might be better. In any case, it is fun to see all the connections to famous people through the players in this game (Tommy Lee Jones was an All-Ivy player on the team who roomed with Al Gore, another Yalie roomed with George W. Bush, another dated Maryl Streep, and the Yale quarterback Brian Dowling was the inspiration for B.D. in the comic Doonesbury) and to hear more about life on campus in the 1960s.
But, this week, I think the NCAA basketball games (for both the men and the women!) will prove to be better entertainment than Harvard Beats Yale 29-29. Go Tigers!